| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Clement 
 
 
 Joined: 24 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1113
 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:51 pm    Post subject: Jul 30 VH |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| W-Wing 46 with strong link 4 in row 7 setting r5c7<>6 solves it. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:56 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I saw two standard VH moves. 
 XY-Wing (465); r9c3<>5
 XYZ-Wing (256); r7c6<>6
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| kuskey 
 
 
 Joined: 10 Dec 2008
 Posts: 141
 Location: Pembroke, NH
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:02 am    Post subject: Jul 30 VH |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Three more in addition to those already cited: 1. xy-wing 456 pivot r7c2 setting r9c4<>4.
 2. w-wing 46 strong link on 6 in c2 setting r6c7<>4.
 3. w-wing 34 strong link on 3 in c5 setting r4c1 and r6c9<>4.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| dongrave 
 
 
 Joined: 06 Mar 2014
 Posts: 572
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 2:54 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I've been going through the archive of very hard puzzles and somehow I solved this one using just the basics.  I figured that I must have made a mistake and got lucky so I did it a second time - and I solved it again by just using the basics!  Could one of you double-check this puzzle for me?  What am I missing?  If you want, I can provide the sequence of steps that I used (I saved them the second time that I did it).  Thanks, Don. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 5:06 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Don, every once in a while a VH sneaks through that can be solved with basics. This is probably not one of them. Whenever I solve one with basics and every other poster shows advanced moves, I get out the eraser and do it again. I've been burned and embarrassed by this issue a couple of times. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| dongrave 
 
 
 Joined: 06 Mar 2014
 Posts: 572
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 5:16 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Thanks Marty!  That's exactly what I'll do from now on!  When I attempted to solve this for the 2nd time, I wrote a sequence number in each square (I thought) so I could easily recap how it was done.  Now I notice that two squares are missing sequence numbers and I'm no longer able to deduce one of the next sequenced squares.  I must have made the same stupid mistake twice!  Sorry about that.  I'll be more careful in the future!  Thanks, Don. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |