| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		arkietech
 
 
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 5:29 am    Post subject: Collection May 27, 2012 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Lots of possiblities
 
  	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
 *-----------*
 
 |..8|...|2..|
 
 |9..|...|..7|
 
 |2.7|...|.93|
 
 |---+---+---|
 
 |4..|.9.|..6|
 
 |...|.2.|...|
 
 |...|..3|1.5|
 
 |---+---+---|
 
 |...|..8|...|
 
 |.5.|43.|...|
 
 |.6.|..7|.84|
 
 *-----------*
 
  | 	  
 
Play/Print online | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:03 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				After basics: 	  | Code: | 	 		  +-------------+-------------+-------------+
 
| 5   34  8   | 39  7   49  | 2   6   1   | 
 
| 9   13  6   | 23  48  12  | 48  5   7   | 
 
| 2   14  7   | 18 *56 *56  | 48  9   3   | 
 
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
 
| 4   28  35  | 18  9   15  | 7   23  6   | 
 
| 1   7   35  |*56  2  *456 | 9   34  8   | 
 
| 6   289 29  | 7   48  3   | 1   24  5   | 
 
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
 
| 7   29  4   |*56 *56  8   | 3   1   29  | 
 
| 8   5   1   | 4   3   29  | 6   7   29  | 
 
| 3   6   29  | 29  1   7   | 5   8   4   | 
 
+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | 	  
 
Deadly pattern 56:  R5C6 = 4.
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 4:31 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| BUG+2. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		arkietech
 
 
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:35 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Same as Keith only different name.
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
 *--------------------------------------------------*
 
 | 5    34   8    | 39   7    49   | 2    6    1    |
 
 | 9    13   6    | 23   48   12   | 48   5    7    |
 
 | 2    14   7    | 18  *56  *56   | 48   9    3    |
 
 |----------------+----------------+----------------|
 
 | 4    28   35   | 18   9    15   | 7    23   6    |
 
 | 1    7    35   |*56   2   *4-56 | 9    34   8    |
 
 | 6    289  29   | 7    48   3    | 1    24   5    |
 
 |----------------+----------------+----------------|
 
 | 7    29   4    |*56  *56   8    | 3    1    29   |
 
 | 8    5    1    | 4    3    29   | 6    7    29   |
 
 | 3    6    29   | 29   1    7    | 5    8    4    |
 
 *--------------------------------------------------*
 
remote pair
 
(5=6)r5c4-(6=5)r4c4-(5=6)r4c5-(6=5)r3c5-(5=6)r3c6 => r5c6<>56; stte
 
 | 	  
 
Play/Print online | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:10 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				
 
 
Marty,
 
 
I also played with the BUG+2and made some deletions, but could not find a one step solution.
 
 
What was your technique?
 
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:30 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | tlanglet wrote: | 	 		  
 
 
Marty,
 
 
I also played with the BUG+2and made some deletions, but could not find a one step solution.
 
 
What was your technique?
 
 
Ted | 	  
 
Ted, 
 
 
I play all my BUG+2s via pincers. In this case the possibilities are 5 in r5c6 and 2 in r6c2. The 5 proves r4c2=2; r7c2<>2. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		arkietech
 
 
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 9:34 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		  | the possibilities are 5 in r5c6 and 2 in r6c2. The 5 proves r4c2=2; r7c2<>2. | 	  
 
 
Is this correct?
 
 
BUG+2:(2)r6c2=(5)r5c6-(5=1)r4c6-(1=8)r4c4-(8=2)r4c2 => r7c2<>2 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 9:48 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				[quote="arkietech"] 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		  | the possibilities are 5 in r5c6 and 2 in r6c2. The 5 proves r4c2=2; r7c2<2> r7c2<>2 | 	  
 
 
Dan,
 
 
I'm not very Eureka-literate, but the cells in your notation are the cells I used to determine that 5 in r5c6 proves r4c2=2. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 10:01 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		   	  | tlanglet wrote: | 	 		  
 
 
Marty,
 
 
I also played with the BUG+2and made some deletions, but could not find a one step solution.
 
 
What was your technique?
 
 
Ted | 	  
 
Ted, 
 
 
I play all my BUG+2s via pincers. In this case the possibilities are 5 in r5c6 and 2 in r6c2. The 5 proves r4c2=2; r7c2<>2. | 	  
 
 
Marty, Your path is as simple as they come. I do not have the details of my endeavor, but I obviously messed the straight forward solution.
 
 
Good Move    
 
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |