dailysudoku.com Forum Index dailysudoku.com
Discussion of Daily Sudoku puzzles
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Set NNP_2 Puzzle 4 -- Advanced

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Puzzles by daj
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
daj95376



Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 3854

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:20 pm    Post subject: Set NNP_2 Puzzle 4 -- Advanced Reply with quote

Code:
 +-----------------------+
 | . . . | 5 . 1 | . . . |
 | . 7 . | 2 6 . | . . 5 |
 | . . 1 | . . 9 | . . 6 |
 |-------+-------+-------|
 | 9 8 . | . 3 . | . 5 . |
 | . 2 . | 1 . . | . 8 7 |
 | 1 . 5 | . . 8 | . 3 2 |
 |-------+-------+-------|
 | . . . | . . . | . . . |
 | . . . | 6 1 5 | . 2 . |
 | . 1 6 | . 2 3 | . . 8 |
 +-----------------------+

Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site

===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Ratings

Can be solved using steps from ...

Basics: Naked/Hidden Single, Naked Pair/Triple, Locked Candidate 1/2

Basics+: Naked Quad, Hidden Pair/Triple/Quad

VH: BUG+1, UR Type 1, X-Wing, XY-Wing, XYZ-Wing

VH+: 2-String Kite, Empty Rectangle, Remote Pair, Skyscraper, Colors, UR Type 2

Advanced: finned/Sashimi X-Wing, Multiple Colors, Swordfish, M-Wing, W-Wing, XY-Chain

Extreme: Jellyfish, (but mostly) Chain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tlanglet



Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 2468
Location: Northern California Foothills

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yet another fun VH type puzzle. Minimal basics and several choices for later techniques. My four step solution was:
Quote:

A kite <3> with pivots in box <3> (or a choice of ERs),
A Type 2 UR on <78> with no deletions but a strong link <7> in row <1> provided a deletion,
xy-wing <238> with pivot<28> in r1c3 deleted two occurrences and a transport removed an additional <3>,
and finally a w-wing <34> with transport completed the fun

Ted Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
storm_norm



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1741

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I call these the "Danny specials"
in the image below notice the UR {7,8}. we know from the rules of unique rectangles that you cannot be left with a 7 and a 8 in r1c7 and r3c7...
then notice the other 7 in column 7
and the other 8 in column 7
as in the image



so either the 7 in r8c7 is true or the 8 in r2c7 is true...A.K.A. Strong Inference.
because if both were false then the Deadly Pattern is forced to exist.
if the 7 in r8c7 is true, then the 7 in r8c1 is not true... or if the 7 in r8c7 is not true...
r2c7 = 8
r2c1 <> 8
r8c1 = 8
either way, the 7 in r8c1 is not true.
and solves the puzzle.
or you can view it by this chain.
UR78[(7)r8c7 = (8)r2c7] - (8)r2c1 = (8)r8c1; r8c1 <> 7
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tlanglet



Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 2468
Location: Northern California Foothills

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great find Norm. IMPRESSIVE Exclamation

Ted
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
storm_norm



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1741

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thank you, Ted.
this particular move was devastating. I have noticed patterns like this in the other puzzles. Every once in a while one proves critically beneficial.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kdelle



Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 59
Location: Hudson, NH

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In Norm's diagram above, in order to avoid the deadly pattern 39 in rows 7 and 8, either r7c2 must be 5 or r8c9 must be 4, either of which forces r8c3 = 8 which also solves the puzzle. I think that's correct logic anyway....

Kathy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
storm_norm



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1741

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
in order to avoid the deadly pattern 39 in rows 7 and 8, either r7c2 must be 5 or r8c9 must be 4, either of which forces r8c3 = 8

Kathy, very nice.
I am curious to know how you formed the inferences to show this.
the two chains I see are as follows:
one starts with the 5 and one starts with the 4

UR39[(4)r8c9 = (5)r7c2] - (5=2)r7c1 - (2)r3c1 = (2-8)r1c3 = (8)r8c3; r8c3 <> 4
uR39[(5)r7c2 = (4)r8c9] - (4)r8c13 = (4-7)r9c1 = (7-8)r8c1 = (8-3)r2c1 = (3-4)r1c2 = (4)r3c2; r3c2 <> 5

as you can see, the one that starts with 5 eliminates the 5 in r3c2
and the one that starts with the 4 does what you pointed out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
daj95376



Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 3854

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Norm, once you have the UR strong link, you can apply forcing chain logic -- my preference.

Code:
UR39[(4)r8c9 = (5)r7c2]

(4)r4c8 -                                     (4=8)r8c3
(5)r7c2 - (5=2)r7c1 - (2=3)r7c3 - (3=4)r5c3 - (4=8)r8c3

However, if you really want an AIC ...

Code:
(8=4)r8c3 - UR39[(4)r8c9 = (5)r7c2] - (5=2)r7c1 - (2=3)r7c3 - (3=4)r5c3 - (4=8)r8c3
___________________________________________________________________________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marty R.



Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 5770
Location: Rochester, NY, USA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about an alternate solution? The 78 UR contains two Hidden URs. Because of the strong link on 7 in row 1, the 8 is removed from r3c7. Because of the strong link on 8 in row 3, the 7 is removed from r1c7.

The 39 UR is a standard Type 6 (X-Wing on 9), so the 9s must be present in both the bivalue cells. The puzzle is now reduced to a BUG+1, with r8c1 = 4 in order to squash the BUG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kdelle



Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 59
Location: Hudson, NH

PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Norm,

My thinking was that a 5 in r7c2 forced a 2 in r7c1 which forced a 3 in r7c3 and then a 4 i r5c3....eliminating a 4 in r8c3. I think that's probably what Danny was saying in his post....but I'm not sure I understand his language yet!!!!!!!!! I AM trying!

Kathy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
storm_norm



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1741

PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kdelle wrote:
Norm,

My thinking was that a 5 in r7c2 forced a 2 in r7c1 which forced a 3 in r7c3 and then a 4 i r5c3....eliminating a 4 in r8c3. I think that's probably what Danny was saying in his post....but I'm not sure I understand his language yet!!!!!!!!! I AM trying!

Kathy


ok, very good. as you can see there are many chains to go about eliminating the 4 in r8c3. my first chain does it, danny's chain does it and your chain does it... Smile

by the way, your chain would look like this
UR78[(4)r8c9 = (5)r7c2] - (5=2)r7c1 - (2=3)r7c3 - (3=4)r5c3; r8c3 <> 4
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marty R.



Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 5770
Location: Rochester, NY, USA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just got around to doing this, even though I've already commented.

An XY-Wing on 283 took out a couple of 3s, then a pincer transport made more eliminations. A W-Wing on 34 with pincer transport finished it off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Asellus



Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 865
Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Norm,

While the 78UR route to your elimination is fine, it isn't necessary:

(7)r8c1 - (7=3)r8c7 - (3=8)r2c7 - (8)r2c1=(8-7)r8c1; r8c1<>7

It is just a 2-cell XY-Chain extended with a conjugate link. Thus, a simple one-step solution without uniqueness assumptions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
daj95376



Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 3854

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This puzzle offers a host of solution paths ... and I don't mean all of the long XY-Chains.

Code:
 after basics and before ER eliminations on <3> -- Norm's PM
 +-----------------------------------------------------+
 |  6   @34   28   |  5    78   1    |  278  9    34   |
 |  38   7    9    |  2    6    4    |  38   1    5    |
 |  25  %45   1    |  3    78   9    |  278 *47   6    |
 |-----------------+-----------------+-----------------|
 |  9    8    7    |  4    3    2    |  6    5    1    |
 | @34   2    34   |  1    5    6    |  9    8    7    |
 |  1    6    5    |  7    9    8    |  4    3    2    |
 |-----------------+-----------------+-----------------|
 |  25   359  23   |  8    4    7    |  1    6    39   |
 |  478  39   48   |  6    1    5    |  37   2    349  |
 | %47   1    6    |  9    2    3    |  5   *47   8    |
 +-----------------------------------------------------+
 # 30 eliminations remain

Useless Skyscraper in [r39] for <4>. Non-aligned end cells (%) each see a bivalue <34> cell (@). Mayhem follows.
(Personally, I prefer to think of this as a W-Wing on steroids.)

If you perform the ER eliminations on <3>, then there is another W-Wing on steroids present. Whose up for M-Wings on steroids?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Puzzles by daj All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group