| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| nataraj 
 
 
 Joined: 03 Aug 2007
 Posts: 1048
 Location: near Vienna, Austria
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:51 am    Post subject: July 7 V?H |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| A reasonably well hidden x-wing does it (x-wing on "7" in cols 3 and 8, removes 7 from r5c1, r8c29)
 
 Or ... could it be ... just basics?
 
 puzzled
 
       
 -----
 
 confirm: I did the puzzle again and no advanced techniques are needed.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| storm_norm 
 
 
 Joined: 18 Oct 2007
 Posts: 1741
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:29 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| maybe the naked triples are suppose to make people scratch their heads?? |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| cgordon 
 
 
 Joined: 04 May 2007
 Posts: 769
 Location: ontario, canada
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:42 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I used an x-wing on <7> to finish it off - but now after reading the other posts I'm gonna have to try again.  Deja vu from last week eh ! Actually,  I did enjoy this one.  I thought it had the more difficult basics of a  “Hard” puzzle (triples and quads). Often the VH’s are “Easy” ones with a wing thrown in.  I'm not convinced this one can be done without a wing.  Like Arnold  - "I will be back"!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| tlanglet 
 
 
 Joined: 17 Oct 2007
 Posts: 2468
 Location: Northern California Foothills
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:27 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| It was a "funny" experience for me. I was doing the basics, and doing more basics, when I realized that the puzzle was resolved without any advanced techniques. I assumed that I had made an incorrect but lucky move so I solved it a second time with the same result! What a "bummer"   
 Ted
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| nataraj 
 
 
 Joined: 03 Aug 2007
 Posts: 1048
 Location: near Vienna, Austria
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:31 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Hm, the x-wing is there right from the beginning (well, after the hidden single 5 in r6c3 removes the third "7" in column 3), so it is hard to say when exactly I used it... 
 But the solution does not depend on a wing:
 
 There are 2 naked quads 1239 row 1 and 1279 col 1.
 
 Soon after a box/line in box 4 restricts 1 to row 5, there is a naked triple 7,8,9 in column 2 takes out 7 in r89c2, which makes r8c3=7 and the x-wing is gone...
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| cgordon 
 
 
 Joined: 04 May 2007
 Posts: 769
 Location: ontario, canada
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 2:26 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| My commitment was to do this like my peers - with no VH steps.  My peers were right - no VH bits are needed - but it sure took me a long time to complete. And that was after cheating and looking at Nataraj's last post. Since I originally completed this very quickly using an x-wing - there has to be a moral there somewhere.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:54 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Maybe I missed something, as basics didn't do it for me. But two URs took care of it. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| nataraj 
 
 
 Joined: 03 Aug 2007
 Posts: 1048
 Location: near Vienna, Austria
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:13 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | cgordon wrote: |  	  | Since I originally completed this very quickly using an x-wing - there has to be a moral there somewhere. | 
 
 Same here. Moral: When you find them ... take them
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Clement 
 
 
 Joined: 24 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1113
 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:26 pm    Post subject: Daily Sudoku: Mon 7 Jul-2008 VH |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| After basic eliminations using triples, quads,lone numbers, box line intersections etc., an X-Wing with candidates of 7's appears in r6c29 and r9c29 elimianatng the 7's in the respective columns solving the puzzle. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:38 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| After placing the <5> in C3, I saw the X-wing on my first scan of the columns.  That places <1> in R5C1, and you are done. 
 Without the X-wing:
 
 Hidden triple <468> in R1B2.  Hidden pair <78> in C8.  Hidden pair <12> in c2.
 
 keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| cgordon 
 
 
 Joined: 04 May 2007
 Posts: 769
 Location: ontario, canada
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:45 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Guys!!!   Please acknowledge this puzzle is a HARD only.  "Very Hard'" solutions are not worthy. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:04 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | cgordon wrote: |  	  | Guys!!!   Please acknowledge this puzzle is a HARD only.  "Very Hard'" solutions are not worthy. | 
 And here, we have a problem.  If you use a very obvious "very hard" X-wing, the puzzle falls apart.  If not, the solution is a long journey.  Much harder, I believe.
 
 Keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| nataraj 
 
 
 Joined: 03 Aug 2007
 Posts: 1048
 Location: near Vienna, Austria
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:46 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | cgordon wrote: |  	  | Guys!!!   Please acknowledge this puzzle is a HARD only.  "Very Hard'" solutions are not worthy. | 
 
 "not worthy" ... hm.
 
 Not sure I want to submit to your judgement.
 Neither do I agree.
 
 Tastes differ ...
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| cgordon 
 
 
 Joined: 04 May 2007
 Posts: 769
 Location: ontario, canada
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:44 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Quote: |  	  | not worthy" ... hm. 
 Not sure I want to submit to your judgement.
 Neither do I agree.
 | 
 
 No, I'm absolutely right eh!  You shouldn't fish with explosives and high tech. fish finders.
 Simplicity = Purity = Satisfaction.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| sudocraz 
 
 
 Joined: 28 Apr 2008
 Posts: 53
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:03 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Neither my husband nor I had to do anything except the basics to solve this one.  No x-wings or URs, nor even any bug removal. I think it was more like a hard than a very hard. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |