| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 3:16 pm    Post subject: DB Saturday Puzzle:  September 1, 2007 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Code: | 	 		  Puzzle: DB090107 ******
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| 2 . . | . . . | . . . | 
 
| 4 . . | 8 . 6 | . 3 . | 
 
| 8 9 . | . 3 1 | . . . | 
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . 4 | . 1 9 | 2 . 8 | 
 
| . . . | . . . | . . . | 
 
| 5 . 9 | 7 8 . | 1 . . | 
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . . | 1 5 . | . 2 7 | 
 
| . 7 . | 3 . 8 | . . 6 | 
 
| . . . | . . . | . . 9 | 
 
+-------+-------+-------+ | 	  
 
 
An easy W-wing is one way ...
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Earl
 
 
  Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 677 Location: Victoria, KS
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 3:57 pm    Post subject: Sept 1 DB | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Also an xy-wing eliminates 2 from R2C5, and opens the puzzle.
 
 
Earl | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		sdq_pete
 
 
  Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 119 Location: Rotterdam, NL
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:28 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I saw the other XY wing, eliminating 2 also from R5C5 (pivot at R1C6):
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+-----------+-----------+------------+
 
| 2  156 3  | 9  4   57 | 67  8  15  |
 
| 4  15  17 | 8  27  6  | 9   3  125 |
 
| 8  9   67 | 25 3   1  | 467 47 25  |
 
+-----------+-----------+------------+
 
| 67 3   4  | 56 1   9  | 2   57 8   |
 
| 67 18  18 | 4  26  25 | 57  9  3   |
 
| 5  2   9  | 7  8   3  | 1   6  4   |
 
+-----------+-----------+------------+
 
| 9  68  68 | 1  5   4  | 3   2  7   |
 
| 1  7   2  | 3  9   8  | 45  45 6   |
 
| 3  4   5  | 26 267 27 | 8   1  9   |
 
+-----------+-----------+------------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
 
 
Peter | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:42 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I missed the W, but the one XY did it. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:32 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		  | I missed the W ... | 	  
 
Look at <26> in C45, connected by strong link on <2> in B2.  Takes out <6> in R9C5.
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Johan
 
 
  Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 206 Location: Bornem  Belgium
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:09 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I missed the xy- wing, but found a 4-cell xy-chain 
 
 
Starting with <6> in R4C4 => R9C4=2 => R9C6=7 => R1C6=5, resulting in two <5> pincer cells in  R4C4 and R1C6, eliminating both <5>'s in R5C6 and R3C4(both can see the <5> pincer cells)
 
 
[56][62][27][75] | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Asellus
 
 
  Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:39 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				As an interesting alternative to the single XY Wing solution...
 
 
Note the {15} UR in R12C29.  There is a <5> strong link in C2 and a <1> strong link in C9.  Thus, <1> is removed from R1C2 and 5 is removed from R2C9. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Johan
 
 
  Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 206 Location: Bornem  Belgium
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 12:39 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Asellus, 
 
 
I followed a diffirent solving path for the [15] UR you mentioned.
 
 
For avoiding the deadly [15] pattern in R12C29.
 
R1C2 must be <6>  or R2C9 must be <2>.
 
 
Presume that R2C9=2  => R2C5=7 => R1C6=5 => R1C9=1
 
 
=> R1C2=6, which means that <6> can only reside in R1C2, logical thinking(or did I make a lucky guess)?
 
 
Because <6> acts like a pincer cell, starting with <2> in R2C9 ends up with <6> in R1C2, which pins the <6> in R1C2. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Asellus
 
 
  Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:45 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Johan wrote: | 	 		  | logical thinking(or did I make a lucky guess)?  | 	  
 
Your logic is fine: either candidate for avoiding the DP forces the other. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |