dailysudoku.com Forum Index dailysudoku.com
Discussion of Daily Sudoku puzzles
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A VH?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Other puzzles
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
keith



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:10 am    Post subject: A VH? Reply with quote

From the London Times:
Code:
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 8 | . . . | 9 3 . |
| 4 2 . | . . 1 | . 7 . |
| 7 . . | 5 . . | . . 4 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 7 . | 2 . 9 | 3 . . |
| . . . | . 6 . | . . . |
| . . 2 | 1 . 4 | . 6 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 5 . . | . . 8 | . . 7 |
| . 9 . | 3 . . | . 1 8 |
| . 4 1 | . . . | 6 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+

Keith

edit: from http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/games_and_puzzles/sudoku/


Last edited by keith on Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Asellus



Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 865
Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are a lot of different options in this puzzle, making it interesting.
I found two different ways to solve it in a single step.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
nataraj



Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 1048
Location: near Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

this is amazing. Usually The Times don't go further than x-wing, but this puzzle certainly needs more than that.

After basics and the expected x-wing in 8 (I think it was in rows 3 and 4 but not sure), this is where something else is needed:

Code:

+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 1       5       8        | 467     247     27       | 9       3       26       |
| 4       2       39       | 68      39      1        | 58      7       56       |
| 7       36      369      | 5       2389    23       | 1       28      4        |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 6       7       45       | 2       58      9        | 3       458     1        |
| 39      1       45       | 78      6       357      | 24578   245     259      |
| 39      8       2        | 1       357     4        | 57      6       59       |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 5       36      36       | 49      1       8        | 24      249     7        |
| 2       9       7        | 3       45      6        | 45      1       8        |
| 8       4       1        | 79      257     257      | 6       59      3        |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+

Of course, there is

(1) an UR (36) in box 1 and box7 (making r3c3=9)
AND another UR (45) in box 4 and 6 (together with 28 in r3c7 removes 2 from r7c8)

OR

(2) going the coloring way, 5 can be removed from r5c7, which sees both ends of

-56=96-85=87-

and extending the chain one "element" ( -27=29- ) also from r5c9.

BUT

none of this solves the puzzle.

What about the short chain "58" (r4c5) - "78" (r5c4) - "79" (r9c4) ?

This little chain can be extended at both ends and yields a lot of eliminations, e.g.
Code:

... - "59" (r9c8) => r9c5<>5
... - "49" (r7c4) - "45" (r8c5) => r6c5<>5
"45" (r4c3) - ... - "59" (r9c8) => r4c8<>5
"45" (r5c3) - "45" (r4c3) - ... - "59" (r9c8) => r5c8 <> 5

with all those "5"s gone, there is nothing but singles left ...

Don't know if that counts as "one move". Just the same, it is amazing how much one can do with one simple chain.

But I am more concerned about "The Times" publishing a difficult puzzle like this one ...
Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
re'born



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nataraj wrote:

What about the short chain "58" (r4c5) - "78" (r5c4) - "79" (r9c4) ?

What about extending this short chain into an xy-loop earlier in the puzzle?
Code:
.---------------------.---------------------.---------------------.
| 1      5      8     | 46-7   247    27    | 9      3      26    |
| 4      2      39    | 68-9   389    1     | 58     7      56    |
| 7      36     369   | 5      2389   23    | 1      28     4     |
:---------------------+---------------------+---------------------:
| 6      7      45    | 2      58*    9     | 3      458    1     |
| 39     1      45    | 78*    6      357   | 24578  2458   259   |
| 39     8      2     | 1      37-5   4     | 57     6      59    |
:---------------------+---------------------+---------------------:
| 5      36     36    | 49*    1      8     | 24     249    7     |
| 2      9      7     | 3      45*    6     | 45     1      8     |
| 8      4      1     | 79*    27-59  257   | 6      59     3     |
'---------------------'---------------------'---------------------'

r4c5 -8- r5c4 -7- r9c4 -9- r7c4 -4- r8c5 -5- r4c5, => r1c4 <> 7, r69c5 <> 5, r2c4,r9c5 <> 9, solving the puzzle.


Last edited by re'born on Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steve R



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 289
Location: Birmingham, England

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:45 pm    Post subject: Changing Times Reply with quote

Nowadays (post Pappacom) the Times publishes a “super fiendish” puzzle every week or so. They usually include a swordfish, as here, though I seem to remember one or two in which a triple was sufficient.

Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nataraj



Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 1048
Location: near Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's right, Steve, they introduced the "super fiendish" category a while ago.
I've been doing both the fiendish and super fiendish for quite some time now, and I never - positively never! - encountered one that could not be solved by x-wing or swordfish (plus basic moves, of course).

In fact, if I remember correctly, there even used to be a short "help" section explaining the x-wing and swordfish techniques, plus they said that those two would be sufficient every time.

I cannot find that information on the current Times pages but I'm sure it was there this summer....

Speaking of summer, there was a "summer special" with some (compared to the weekly fare) extra hard puzzles. But those could be solved with xwing and swordfish, too.

@keith: which edition of the Times did you take the puzzle from?

@Steve
Quote:
They usually include a swordfish, as here
I am notoriously bad in spotting swordfish patterns. Didn't see one here. Does it solve the puzzle?

@re'born. Spot on. I can't believe I played around with those 58 45 78 ... and failed to close the loop ... Embarassed
too preoccupied with the harvest those fives yielded, I guess ... Smile


edit: that leaves the question: what is the SECOND move?
Asellus wrote:
There are a lot of different options in this puzzle, making it interesting.
I found two different ways to solve it in a single step.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Steve R



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 289
Location: Birmingham, England

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don’t tackle the super fiendish largely because I find looking for swordfish inexpressibly tedious. However, I’m happy to have a go if someone else fills in the pencil marks!

In your grid it is on 5, based on rows 2, 6 and 8. The elimination of 5 from r4c5 does indeed solve the puzzle.

Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nataraj



Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 1048
Location: near Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thx, Steve!

nataraj wrote:
I never - positively never! - encountered one that could not be solved by x-wing or swordfish


so ... I should have looked. Kinda stupid to know the solution and not look for it. Hm. Very embarrassing Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Asellus



Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 865
Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep! It is the Swordfish and the XY Loop.

That {45} UR is also interesting.

nataraj - That little <5> coloring you did could be called a "Kite" or "Turbot Fish," I believe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
nataraj



Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 1048
Location: near Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Asellus wrote:
nataraj - That little <5> coloring you did could be called a "Kite" or "Turbot Fish," I believe.


I believe so, too. But I am never sure ...
So many colorful names for basically the same thing -
strong link - weak link.

Turbot fish, jellyfish. Kraken? Sushi? Sashimi? Fillet?
Oh-fish! Yes.

Don't get me wrong. I like dancing. And I call the dances by their proper names. Tango. Waltz. Rumba. And not: left foot, right foot.

So - I'll probably join the legitimate fishermen's crowd eventually.
And know a trout from a salmon.
Until then: "it's still rock and roll to me..." Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
keith



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
@keith: which edition of the Times did you take the puzzle from?


I found it here:

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/games_and_puzzles/sudoku/

They don't seem to have an archive. It was SuDoku No. 1588, "Super Fiendish".

I was going to post it "for Nataraj" to challenge his new skills, until I realized the UR's are there but don't help to solve it.

Disregarding the UR's, at this point:
Code:
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 1     5     8     | 467   247   27    | 9     3     26    |
| 4     2     39    | 689   389   1     | 58    7     56    |
| 7     36    369   | 5     2389  23    | 1     28    4     |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 6     7     45    | 2     58    9     | 3     458   1     |
| 39    1     45    | 78    6     357   | 24578 2458  259   |
| 39    8     2     | 1     357   4     | 57    6     59    |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 5     36    36    | 49    1     8     | 24    249   7     |
| 2     9     7     | 3     45    6     | 45    1     8     |
| 8     4     1     | 79    2579  257   | 6     59    3     |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+

There is an X-wing on <8>, it doesn't help.

There are a pair of complementary (making the same eliminations) swordfish on <5>, to be found either in the rows or the columns.

I found it interesting that the swordfish is kind of essential, in that for me the puzzle would not succumb to coloring, W-wings, etc.


Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
re'born



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

keith wrote:

I found it interesting that the swordfish is kind of essential, in that for me the puzzle would not succumb to coloring, W-wings, etc.

The xy-loop above solves the puzzle without the swordfish.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keith



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

re'born,

Yes. But time is tight for me during the week, I can only examine the details over the weekend. My problem Sad ,not yours!

Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nataraj



Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 1048
Location: near Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, Keith !

It is indeed one of the more recent "super fiendish". Haven't looked in a while, so my collection ends at #1542 end of September. Time to go harvest again (I like to print out a whole bunch of them and keep them in store for those days when I need my usual sudoku for breakfast and the local paper doesn't have a good one)

Here is the link to the Times sudoku archive:

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sitesearch.do?sortBy=newest&offset=0&query=sudoku&hitsperpage=10&nextOffset=0

Cheers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Other puzzles All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group