| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:51 pm    Post subject: June 27, Very Hard | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				From my perspective, this was the most enjoyable one I've seen, because it afforded the opportunity to use a few different techniques. There was a block interaction, a Type 4 rectangle and an X-Wing. Finally, coloring on "2" broke the puzzle open.
 
 
Thanks Sam, hope to see more like this one. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		marvwriter
 
 
  Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 2 Location: Houston, Texas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:47 pm    Post subject: June 27 very hard | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I agree. It was very enjoyable and a real workout for the little gray cells. I used the block interaction, hidden pairs and 3 x-wings to solve it. (One of the x-wings I used was on the "2s.") | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		frankp329
 
 
  Joined: 29 Jun 2006 Posts: 1
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:32 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				This is far as I got on this one. Please help I am new at this 
 
- - 7        - - -         - - -
 
4 9 6       - - 8        - - 3
 
- - 1       9 - -        - - 6
 
- 4 3       - - 2       6 8 -
 
6 1 -       8 - 4      2 3 7
 
- 2 8      3 - -       5 - -
 
1 - -       - - 3       4 - -
 
8 3 -      1 - -       9 7 2
 
- - -        - - -       3 - - | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		gigi
 
 
  Joined: 04 Jun 2006 Posts: 5 Location: Central Texas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:45 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| The only possible positions for 6 in boxes 5 and 8 is in cols 5 and 6 which forces a 6 in box 1 at row 1, col 4.   That should get you going again!  Good luck | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		gigi
 
 
  Joined: 04 Jun 2006 Posts: 5 Location: Central Texas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:10 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| That should be.... it forces a 6 in Box 2 (not box 1) row 1, col 4 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		David
 
 
  Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 58 Location: Bedford, UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:20 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| ?? I didn't see any X wing or UR, it just seemed to fall out (albeit slowly) from the normal techniques and logic. Did anyone else use the 'advanced' techniques ? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		ravel
 
 
  Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:56 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| Hm, what gigi described can be looked at using either box/box interaction or x-wing. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Xantara
 
 
  Joined: 05 Jun 2006 Posts: 7
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:08 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi all,
 
 
I had trouble cracking this one.  So I checked out your discussion.
 
I had never used the x-wing solving technique.  I studied your explanations and read some things out on the web as well.  Very interesting.
 
 
I understood what I read okay and pored over some good examples.
 
But I couldn't find any place in the puzzle to apply the x-wing -- at least not at the juncture where I stalled out.  
 
 
Because I was studying the numbers so long looking for x-wing patterns, I stumbled over traditional clues.  And in the end, that's how I solved the puzzle.  
 
 
So, in answer to David's query, no, I didn't use any advanced techniques either, but I arrived at the solution.  Hurrah!
 
 
Xantara | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |