| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:39 pm    Post subject: Free Press March 23, 2012 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Multi-step?
 
 
Keith
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  Puzzle: FP032312
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . 3 . | . . . | . 6 . |
 
| 4 . 6 | . 3 . | 8 . 2 |
 
| . . 2 | 1 . . | . 5 . |
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| 8 . . | . . 3 | . . . |
 
| . . 3 | 8 . 2 | 5 . . |
 
| . . . | 7 . . | . . 9 |
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . 9 . | . . 1 | 6 . . |
 
| 3 . . | . 2 . | 7 . . |
 
| . 1 . | . . . | . 9 . |
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		arkietech
 
 
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:03 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I love those "hot wings"
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 
 | 159   3     1589  | 2     458   458   | 49    6     7     |
 
 | 4     5-7   6     | 59    3     579   | 8     1     2     |
 
 |a79    8-7   2     | 1     4678  4678  | 49    5     3     |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 8    d4567 c579   | 56    569   3     | 1     2     46    |
 
 |b19    46    3     | 8     19    2     | 5     7     46    |
 
 | 156   2     15    | 7     1456  456   | 3     8     9     |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 2     9     578   | 4     578   1     | 6     3     58    |
 
 | 3     568   58    | 569   2     5689  | 7     4     1     |
 
 | 567   1     4     | 3     5678  5678  | 2     9     58    |
 
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 
 m-wing
 
(7=9)r3c1-r5c1=(9-7)r4c3=(7)r4c2 => r23c2<>7
 
stte
 
 | 	  
 
 
Edit: oops oop again    i'm good tonight!
 
 
but not hot.
 
Play/print online
  Last edited by arkietech on Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:05 am; edited 4 times in total | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		SudoQ
 
 
  Joined: 02 Aug 2011 Posts: 127
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:34 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | arkietech wrote: | 	 		  I love those "hot wings"
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 
 | 159   3     1589  | 2     458   458   | 49    6     7     |
 
 | 4     5-7   6     | 59    3     579   | 8     1     2     |
 
 |a79    8-7   2     | 1     4678  4678  | 49    5     3     |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 8    d4567 c579   | 56    569   3     | 1     2     46    |
 
 |b19    46    3     | 8     19    2     | 5     7     46    |
 
 | 156   2     15    | 7     1456  456   | 3     8     9     |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 2     9     578   | 4     578   1     | 6     3     58    |
 
 | 3     568   58    | 569   2     5689  | 7     4     1     |
 
 | 567   1     4     | 3     5678  5678  | 2     9     58    |
 
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 
 h-wing
 
(7=9)r3c1-r5c1=(9-7)r3c3=(7) => r23c2<>7
 
stte
 
 | 	 
  | 	  
 
Your grid doesn't seem to match your string.
 
 
/SudoQ | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:55 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I wouldn't know a hot wing from a chicken wing. 
 
 
Type 1 UR (46); r4c2<>46. After cleanup leaves us here:
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
| 159 3  1589 | 2  458  458  | 49 6 7  |
 
| 4   57 6    | 59 3    579  | 8  1 2  |
 
| 79  78 2    | 1  4678 4678 | 49 5 3  |
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
| 8   57 579  | 56 569  3    | 1  2 4  |
 
| 19  4  3    | 8  19   2    | 5  7 6  |
 
| 6   2  15   | 7  145  45   | 3  8 9  |
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
| 2   9  578  | 4  578  1    | 6  3 58 |
 
| 3   6  58   | 59 2    589  | 7  4 1  |
 
| 57  1  4    | 3  5678 5678 | 2  9 58 |
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
 
 
In the Type 3 UR (59) in boxes 28, either a 7 in r2c6 or 8 in r8c6 kills the DP. The 8 proves a 7 in r3c1; r2c2, r3c56<>7. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Free Press March 23, 2012 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				
 
My solver used a potpourri of steps, and still ended up using an XY-Chain to finish off the puzzle. As I see it, using a single-step chain from the beginning saves a lot of headache. ( 4x M-Wing, 4x S-Wing, and 4x L2-Wing are available. )
 
 
 
BTW: Dan's "h-wing" is an M-Wing that goes through r4c3 (not r3c3).
 
 
Note: Every H-Wing starts and ends in the same unit ... and r3c1 & r4c2 are not in the same unit. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		arkietech
 
 
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:26 am    Post subject: Re: Free Press March 23, 2012 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | daj95376 wrote: | 	 		  BTW: Dan's "h-wing" is an M-Wing that goes through r4c3 (not r3c3).
 
 
Note: Every H-Wing starts and ends in the same unit ... and r3c1 & r4c2 are not in the same unit. | 	  
 
 
I'm going to keep working till I understand wings   
 
 
Sorry for the boo boos. Let me know if it is still wrong. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:02 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Sudoku Susser:
 
 
  1 x Simple Forcing Chains
 
  1 x Fishy Cycles
 
  3 x XY-Wing
 
  2 x Unique Rectangles and Loops
 
  4 x Intersection Removal
 
  1 x Simple Naked Sets
 
  18 x Pinned Squares
 
 
(Not in order.  The fishy cycle can be seen as a skyscraper.)
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:21 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Another solution is my old friend, the "almost naked pair".
 
 
anp(56=9)r4c45-r5c5=r5c1-(9=7)r3c1-(7=*58)r23c2-(58=6)r8c2-r8c4=(6)r4c4; r4c2<>5*, r4c29,r6c56<>6
 
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:19 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		  I wouldn't know a hot wing from a chicken wing. 
 
 
Type 1 UR (46); r4c2<>46. After cleanup leaves us here:
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
| 159 3  1589 | 2  458  458  | 49 6 7  |
 
| 4   57 6    | 59 3    579  | 8  1 2  |
 
| 79  78 2    | 1  4678 4678 | 49 5 3  |
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
| 8   57 579  | 56 569  3    | 1  2 4  |
 
| 19  4  3    | 8  19   2    | 5  7 6  |
 
| 6   2  15   | 7  145  45   | 3  8 9  |
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
| 2   9  578  | 4  578  1    | 6  3 58 |
 
| 3   6  58   | 59 2    589  | 7  4 1  |
 
| 57  1  4    | 3  5678 5678 | 2  9 58 |
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
 
 
In the Type 3 UR (59) in boxes 28, either a 7 in r2c6 or 8 in r8c6 kills the DP. The 8 proves a 7 in r3c1; r2c2, r3c56<>7. | 	  
 
 
Please note, as you might already have, that my grid is in error, although it doesn't change my UR solution. The grid failed to consider the locked 8s in box 7 and the 59 pair in c4. Sorry. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		arkietech
 
 
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:09 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | tlanglet wrote: | 	 		  Another solution is my old friend, the "almost naked pair".
 
 
anp(56=9)r4c45-r5c5=r5c1-(9=7)r3c1-(7=*58)r23c2-(58=6)r8c2-r8c4=(6)r4c4; r4c2<>5*, r4c29,r6c56<>6
 
 
Ted | 	  
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 
 | 159   3     1589  | 2     458   458   | 49    6     7     |
 
 | 4    e57    6     | 59    3     579   | 8     1     2     |
 
 |d79   e78    2     | 1     4678  4678  | 49    5     3     |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 8     4567  579   |a56   a569   3     | 1     2     46    |
 
 |c19    46    3     | 8    b19    2     | 5     7     46    |
 
 | 156   2     15    | 7     1456  456   | 3     8     9     |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 2     9     578   | 4     578   1     | 6     3     58    |
 
 | 3    f568   58    |g569   2     5689  | 7     4     1     |
 
 | 567   1     4     | 3     5678  5678  | 2     9     58    |
 
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 
anp(56=9)r4c45-r5c5=r5c1-(9=7)r3c1-(7=*58)r23c2-(58=6)r8c2-r8c4=(6)r4c4; r4c2<>5*, r4c29,r6c56<>6 
 
 
if a=56 r6c56,r4c29>56
 
if a4c5=9 r4c4=6, r4c2<>5 r6c56,r4c29<>6 => r6c56,r4c29<>6, r4c2<>5
 
 | 	  
 
I like it! Got to learn how to spot them.
 
 
Play/print online | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:33 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		   	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
| 159 3  1589 | 2  458  458  | 49 6 7  |
 
| 4   57 6    | 59 3    579  | 8  1 2  |
 
| 79  78 2    | 1  4678 4678 | 49 5 3  |
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
| 8   57 579  | 56 569  3    | 1  2 4  |
 
| 19  4  3    | 8  19   2    | 5  7 6  |
 
| 6   2  15   | 7  145  45   | 3  8 9  |
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+
 
| 2   9  578  | 4  578  1    | 6  3 58 |
 
| 3   6  58   | 59 2    589  | 7  4 1  |
 
| 57  1  4    | 3  5678 5678 | 2  9 58 |
 
+-------------+--------------+---------+ | 	  
 
In the Type 3 UR (59) in boxes 28, either a 7 in r2c6 or 8 in r8c6 kills the DP. The 8 proves a 7 in r3c1; r2c2, r3c56<>7. | 	  
 
How?
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		JC Van Hay
 
 
  Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:48 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Marty's Type 3 UR(59)B28 step in Eureka! notation ...    
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
| 159   3    159  | 2     458   458    | 49  6  7  |
 
| 4     5-7  6    | (59)  3     (795)  | 8   1  2  |
 
| (79)  8    2    | 1     46-7  46-7   | 49  5  3  |
 
+-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
| 8     57   579  | 6     59    3      | 1   2  4  |
 
| (19)  4    3    | 8     19    2      | 5   7  6  |
 
| 6     2    (15) | 7     145   45     | 3   8  9  |
 
+-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
| 2     9    578  | 4     578   1      | 6   3  58 |
 
| 3     6    (58) | (59)  2     (895)  | 7   4  1  |
 
| 57    1    4    | 3     5678  5678   | 2   9  58 |
 
+-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
 
7r2c6=[DP(59)r28c46=8r8c6]-(8=5)r8c3-(5=1)r6c3-(1=9)r5c1-(9=7)r3c1 => -7r2c2.r3c56 | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:58 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | JC Van Hay wrote: | 	 		  Marty's Type 3 UR(59)B28 step in Eureka! notation ...    
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
| 159   3    159  | 2     458   458    | 49  6  7  |
 
| 4     5-7  6    | (59)  3     (795)  | 8   1  2  |
 
| (79)  8    2    | 1     46-7  46-7   | 49  5  3  |
 
+-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
| 8     57   579  | 6     59    3      | 1   2  4  |
 
| (19)  4    3    | 8     19    2      | 5   7  6  |
 
| 6     2    (15) | 7     145   45     | 3   8  9  |
 
+-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
| 2     9    578  | 4     578   1      | 6   3  58 |
 
| 3     6    (58) | (59)  2     (895)  | 7   4  1  |
 
| 57    1    4    | 3     5678  5678   | 2   9  58 |
 
+-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
 
7r2c6=[DP(59)r28c46=8r8c6]-(8=5)r8c3-(5=1)r6c3-(1=9)r5c1-(9=7)r3c1 => -7r2c2.r3c56 | 	 
  | 	  
 
Thanks.  If you go through R9C1, you conclude R3C1=9.
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		JC Van Hay
 
 
  Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:21 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | keith wrote: | 	 		  | If you go through R9C1, you conclude R3C1=9. | 	  
 
Ok, this means r8c3<>5 and the DP is unneeded    
 
 
Marty's step may be advantageously replaced by the XY Chain :
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  +----------------+----------------+-----------+
 
| 159   3   159  | 2   458   458  | 49  6  7  |
 
| 4     57  6    | 59  3     579  | 8   1  2  |
 
| (79)  8   2    | 1   467   467  | 49  5  3  |
 
+----------------+----------------+-----------+
 
| 8     57  579  | 6   59    3    | 1   2  4  |
 
| (19)  4   3    | 8   19    2    | 5   7  6  |
 
| 6     2   (15) | 7   145   45   | 3   8  9  |
 
+----------------+----------------+-----------+
 
| 2     9   78-5 | 4   578   1    | 6   3  58 |
 
| 3     6   8-5  | 59  2     589  | 7   4  1  |
 
| (57)  1   4    | 3   5678  5678 | 2   9  58 |
 
+----------------+----------------+-----------+
 
 
(5=1)r6c3-(1=9)r5c1-(9=7)r3c1-(7=5)r9c1 => -5r78c3; stte | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:02 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  +-------------+-----------------+---------+
 
|  159 3   1589 | 2  458   458  | 49 6 7  |
 
|  4   57  6    | 59 3     579  | 8  1 2  |
 
| E79  78  2    | 1  4678  4678 | 49 5 3  |
 
+-------------+-----------------+---------+
 
|  8   57  579  | 56 569   3    | 1  2 4  |
 
| D19  4   3    | 8  19    2    | 5  7 6  |
 
|  6   2  C15   | 7  145   45   | 3  8 9  |
 
+-------------+-----------------+---------+
 
|  2   9   578  | 4  578   1    | 6  3 58 |
 
|  3   6  B58   | 59 2    A589  | 7  4 1  |
 
|  57  1   4    | 3  5678  5678 | 2  9 58 |
 
+-------------+-----------------+---------+  | 	  
 
 
By the way, if I may ask a question that has theoretical, but no practical, value: when doing something like this can r28c6 be considered a 78 pseudo cell? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:32 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		  
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  +-------------+-----------------+---------+
 
|  159 3   1589 | 2  458   458  | 49 6 7  |
 
|  4  *57  6    | 59 3     579  | 8  1 2  |
 
| E79  78  2    | 1  4678  4678 | 49 5 3  |
 
+-------------+-----------------+---------+
 
|  8   57  579  | 56 569   3    | 1  2 4  |
 
| D19  4   3    | 8  19    2    | 5  7 6  |
 
|  6   2  C15   | 7  145   45   | 3  8 9  |
 
+-------------+-----------------+---------+
 
|  2   9   578  | 4  578   1    | 6  3 58 |
 
|  3   6 *B58   | 59 2    A589  | 7  4 1  |
 
|  57  1   4    | 3  5678  5678 | 2  9 58 |
 
+-------------+-----------------+---------+  | 	  
 
 
By the way, if I may ask a question that has theoretical, but no practical, value: when doing something like this can r28c6 be considered a 78 pseudo cell? | 	  
 
Yes, and it's not theoretical.  the cells * are an XY-wing with the pseudocell, pincers on 5.
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |