| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		Clement
 
 
  Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1113 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:13 pm    Post subject: Sep 25 VH | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| W-Wing 69 with strong link 6 in col 9 setting r9c3<>9 solves it. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:05 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I tried to use just the standard VH moves and it took me an X-Wing on 6 and XY-Wing on 698. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		George Woods
 
 
  Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 304 Location: Dorset UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:45 am    Post subject: w wing | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I found it curious that the W-Wing in 69 could either use the 6s in col 2 or col 9! though of course the conclusion is the same | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:13 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				After basics: 	  | Code: | 	 		  +----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 48   9    2    | 7    5    48   | 1    6    3    | 
 
| 3    5    1    | 9    6    2    | 7    8    4    | 
 
| 468  7    68   | 18   3    148  | 59   2    59   | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 1    4    69   | 3    2    7    | 8    59   56   | 
 
| 5    2    3    | 6    8    9    | 4    7    1    | 
 
| 689  68   7    | 4    1    5    | 36   39   2    | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 689  3    5689 | 158  7    18   | 2    4    69   | 
 
| 7    1    4    | 2    9    6    | 35   35   8    | 
 
| 2    68   5689 | 58   4    3    | 69   1    7    | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | 	  This grid has a UR 48 and patterns on 6:  An X-wing and its Swordfish complement, and an XYZ-wing -689.
 
 
After the X-wing, there is a 6-89 XY-wing, bringing us to here: 	  | Code: | 	 		  +-------------+-------------+-------------+
 
| 4   9   2   | 7   5   8   | 1   6   3   | 
 
| 3   5   1   | 9   6   2   | 7   8   4   | 
 
| 6   7   8   | 1   3   4   | 59  2   59  | 
 
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
 
| 1   4   69  | 3   2   7   | 8   59  56  | 
 
| 5   2   3   | 6   8   9   | 4   7   1   | 
 
| 89  68  7   | 4   1   5   | 36  39  2   | 
 
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
 
| 89  3   569 | 58  7   1   | 2   4   69  | 
 
| 7   1   4   | 2   9   6   | 35  35  8   | 
 
| 2   68  59  | 58  4   3   | 69  1   7   | 
 
+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | 	  Marty, I do not think your two moves solve it.  There is a BUG+1, or the wings:  XY-wing -589, or -689, or XYZ 56-9.
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Clement
 
 
  Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1113 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:20 pm    Post subject: Re: w wing | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | George Woods wrote: | 	 		  | I found it curious that the W-Wing in 69 could either use the 6s in col 2 or col 9! though of course the conclusion is the same | 	  It is because the 69 is strongly linked in 6 on either end in the BOXES and the Columns. It is normal. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:58 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  | Marty, I do not think your two moves solve it. | 	  
 
Yep, I don't know what I did wrong but I see it needs another move. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |