| 
 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic |  
		| Author | Message |  
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:49 pm    Post subject: DB Saturday Puzzle (March 18) |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Here is today's David Bodycombe puzzle: 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | 
 Puzzle: DB031806 ******
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | 2 . 6 | . . . | . 9 . |
 | . . 8 | . 9 . | 7 . 6 |
 | . 9 . | 5 . . | . 1 . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . . | . 5 8 | . 3 . |
 | . 7 . | . . . | . 8 . |
 | . 2 . | 7 1 . | . . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . 8 . | . . 7 | . 5 . |
 | 4 . 5 | . 8 . | 6 . . |
 | . 6 . | . . . | 4 . 8 |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 
 
 | 
 
 My solution, which I do not think is very elegant, involves a contradiction and then coloring.
 
 Keith
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| David Bryant 
 
 
 Joined: 29 Jul 2005
 Posts: 559
 Location: Denver, Colorado
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:08 pm    Post subject: I found a "6-star constellation" |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Hi, Keith! 
 These Bodycombe puzzles are definitely getting more intricate. After making the "obvious" moves and eliminations I arrived at this position.
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | 2    14     6     8     7    14*   35     9    35 13     5     8    123    9    123    7     4     6
 37     9    47     5    46    346    8     1     2
 6    14*   149   49     5     8     2     3     7
 5     7    349  3469    2   3469   19     8    149
 8     2    349    7     1    349   59     6    459
 19     8     2    46    46     7    139    5    139
 4     3     5    129    8    129    6     7    19
 179    6    17    19     3     5     4     2     8
 | 
 The best I could do here is use the "6-star constellation" defined by r1c6 & r4c2.
 
 A. These cells are linked through r1c2 -- they're either both "1" or both "4".
 B. If they're both 4 then r3c5 = 6 ==> r3c6 = 3
 C. But we also have r4c4 = 9 ==> r6c6 = 3
 
 So both r1c6 & r4c2 must be "1" ... the rest is fairly simple.
 
 I also noticed that the three cells r7c1, r8c9, and r9c4 are similarly linked -- either all three of them are "1", or all three are "9". I didn't see a convenient way to use that information, though.  dcb
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 5:12 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I used basic techniques, then one forcing chain solved about eight cells and opened the floodgates. |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:24 pm    Post subject: My solution |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| David, 
 Here is what I did:
 
 From the position you posted, assume R9C1 is <1>, and follow the two implications:
 
 R9C1 has been set to <1>.
 R9C3 must be <7>.
 R3C3 must be <4>.
 R1C2 must be <1>.
 
 R9C1 has been set to <1>.
 R9C4 must be <9>.
 R4C4 must be <4>.
 R4C2 must be <1>, which is a contradiction in C2.
 
 So, R9C1 is not <1>.  Then, using coloring on <1>:
 
 R9C4A  R9C3a  R7C1A  R2C1a  R2C4A.  There are two squares labeled "A" in C4, thus the squares labeled "a" must be <1>, and all the remaining moves are forced.
 
 Keith
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		|  |  
  
	| 
 
 | You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 You cannot edit your posts in this forum
 You cannot delete your posts in this forum
 You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
 |  
 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
 
 |