| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		alanr555
 
 
  Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Posts: 198 Location: Bideford Devon EX39
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:31 pm    Post subject: November 26th - Hard | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
This one proved to be benign using Mandatory Pairs.
 
There was no need to construct the 'Missing' profiles
 
(although 'counting' was, of course, required).
 
The number of Pairs identified was gratifying large.
 
 
There were some occasions where two cells in a
 
region held pairs a and ab (the partner for b being
 
elsewher in the region) and then became eligible 
 
for a further pair c - giving ac and abc.
 
 
This situation is very welcome. From it emerges a
 
Mutual Reception pair  (ac) plus (b) is excluded and
 
its partner is resolved.
 
 
There were also some in-region chains so that resolving
 
one value set off a cascade of other resolutions so that
 
from having only three, four or five cells resolved in the
 
region, very suddenly all nine were resolved.
 
 
Sometimes, it can seem unrewarding just identifying
 
the pairs but when the resolutions cascade in that way
 
one can see that one's earlier faith was justified. This
 
seems somehow to have a differnt quality from the
 
searching for patterns in candidate profiles.
 
 
This is an excellent starter for anyone wishing to get to
 
grips with Mandatory pairs - following on the worked 
 
example of November 19th. I would welcome feedback
 
on what works and what does not. I believe that the idea
 
is sound - but some aspects of the practice could do with
 
a little updating from the notes that I collated back in 
 
October and submitted to this site.
 
 
[url=http://www.dailysudoku.co.uk/sudoku/forums/viewtopic.php?t=187&highlight=mandatory+pairs] Here is the link to the previous 
 
notes.[/url]
 
 
Alan Rayner  BS23 2QT
 
 | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		David Bryant
 
 
  Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 559 Location: Denver, Colorado
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:40 pm    Post subject: Note on "BB Code" | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi, Alan!
 
 
The "BB Code" for urls won't work right when it's embedded inside the "code" tags. This is just in the nature of cleanup ...  dcb
 
 
(quoting AlanR555)
 
Here is the link to the previous notes. | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |