| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:43 pm    Post subject: Vanhegan extreme |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Puzzle 6-625372, rated 2.1.0.1.1 
 If anyone wants to take a shot at this, I'd be interested to see what's there. I found nothing and had to use a couple of rounds of Medusa.
 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . 7 | . 4 . | 9 . . |
 | . 8 . | 1 . . | . . . |
 | 4 2 . | 5 . 9 | . . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . 5 | . . 4 | . . . |
 | 7 1 8 | . . . | 6 2 4 |
 | . . . | 8 . . | 5 . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . . | 6 . 2 | . 8 9 |
 | . . . | . . 1 | . 6 . |
 | . . 3 | . 9 . | 1 . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 
 | 
 Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| storm_norm 
 
 
 Joined: 18 Oct 2007
 Posts: 1741
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:12 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Code: |  	  | .------------------------.------------------------.------------------------. | 1356    356     7      | 23      4       368    | 9       135     123568 |
 | 3569    8       69     | 1       2367    367    | 2347    3457    23567  |
 | 4       2       16     | 5       3678    9      | 378     137     13678  |
 :------------------------+------------------------+------------------------:
 | 2369    369     5      | 27      1267    4      | 378     1379    1378   |
 | 7       1       8      | 9       35      35     | 6       2       4      |
 | 2369    3469    2469   | 8       1267    67     | 5       1379    137    |
 :------------------------+------------------------+------------------------:
 | 15      457     14     | 6       357     2      | 347     8       9      |
 | 2589    4579    249    | 347     3578    1      | 2347    6       2357   |
 | 2568    4567    3      | 47      9       578    | 1       457     257    |
 '------------------------'------------------------'------------------------'
 | 
 1. (2)r1c4 = (2-8)r1c9 = (8)r1c6 - (8)r9c6 = (8-2)r9c1 = (2)r9c9 - (2)r8c7 = (2)r2c7; r2c5 <> 2
 2. XYZ - wing {1,3,5} in box 1
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:16 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Code: |  	  | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |  1356    356     7       |  23      4       368     |  9       135     123568  |
 |  3569    8       69      |  1       2367    367     |  2347    3457    23567   |
 |  4       2       16      |  5       3678    9       |  378     137     13678   |
 |--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------|
 |  2369    369     5       |  27      1267    4       |  378     1379    1378    |
 |  7       1       8       |  9       35      35      |  6       2       4       |
 |  2369    3469    2469    |  8       1267    67      |  5       1379    137     |
 |--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------|
 |  15      457     14      |  6       357     2       |  347     8       9       |
 |  2589    4579    249     |  347     3578    1       |  2347    6       2357    |
 |  2568    4567    3       |  47      9       578     |  1       457     257     |
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 # 122 eliminations remain
 
 | 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | 1) Sometimes, extending an AIC into a non-AIC is useful. 
 extended     | ----------------- AIC ---------------- |
 [r1c9]=2 =>  [r9c9]=2=[r9c1]=8=[r9c6]-8-[r1c6]=8=[r1c9]  =>  [r1c9]<>2
 
 2) Same XYZ-Wing as Norm.
 
 | 
 Sorry, but NL notation seems the most comfortable for me here.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Asellus 
 
 
 Joined: 05 Jun 2007
 Posts: 865
 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:15 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | daj95376 wrote: |  	  | Sometimes, extending an AIC into a non-AIC is useful. | 
 Your elimination is an AIC:
 (2)r1c9 - (2)r9c9=(2-8)r9c1=(8)r9c6 - (8)r1c6=(8-2)r1c9; r1c9<>2
 
 In NL:
 [r1c9]-2-[r9c9]=2=[r9c1]=8=[r9c6]-8-[r1c6]=8=[r1c9]  =>  [r1c9]<>2
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:49 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Asellus wrote: |  	  |  	  | daj95376 wrote: |  	  | Sometimes, extending an AIC into a non-AIC is useful. | 
 Your elimination is an AIC:
 (2)r1c9 - (2)r9c9=(2-8)r9c1=(8)r9c6 - (8)r1c6=(8-2)r1c9; r1c9<>2
 
 In NL:
 [r1c9]-2-[r9c9]=2=[r9c1]=8=[r9c6]-8-[r1c6]=8=[r1c9]  =>  [r1c9]<>2
 | 
 The last time I looked, the green logic represents weak inference ... and prohibits the chain from being an AIC.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Asellus 
 
 
 Joined: 05 Jun 2007
 Posts: 865
 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:09 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | daj95376 wrote: |  	  | The last time I looked, the green logic represents weak inference ... and prohibits the chain from being an AIC. | 
 Not at all.  It is an AIC loop with a weak link discontinuity.  (2)r1c9 is weakly linked to the <8> in the same cell and to the <2> at r9c9.  These in turn are strongly linked by the AIC.  The Nice Loop convention of linking "cells" rather than candidate digits obscures this, perhaps.  Clearly notated discontinuous AIC loops always begin and end with the items at the discontinuity.  Some people omit the discontinuity in their notation, but it is there nonetheless.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:31 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Asellus wrote: |  	  | Not at all.  It is an AIC loop with a weak link discontinuity. | 
 Yes
   
 I'd drilling the basic AIC rules into my head, and I'm still adjusting to the concept of an AIC loop with a weak link. Given my failing memory anymore, odds are that I'll repeat this mistake. Sorry
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |